The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 21:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Treasure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG as it has not been published in reliable and independent sources, also fails WP:BOOKCRIT. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The article needs at least two non-trivial sources about the topic. www.timelash.com is not an independent source. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect. I tried to find citations, but can't find anything other than fan pages, blogs and mentions. Lovewiki106 (talk) 19:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Lovewiki106: Redirect to where? Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Past Doctor Adventures would be best. Lovewiki106 (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable, www.timelash.com doesn't meet GNG as it isn't reliable IMO. VickKiang (talk) 01:24, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.