The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn‎. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable newspaper, failing WP:NNEWSPAPER and WP:GNG, despite being a common newspaper in Australia. Tagged for no references since February 2017. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media, and Australia. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The nominator doesn't seem to have bothered to look for references before nominating the article for deletion. The Mumbrella website (which covers the Australian media) returns 25 pages of results for a search on this publication: [1], for instance, many of which seem usable. Nick-D (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Nick-D, I did not seem to find any notable references for that version of the Telegraph. Pining @Cunard, to see if he can find additional refs. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 08:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  As the nominatior of this deletion discussion, I will move the Sunday Telegraph specific controversies already on The Daily Telegraph (Sydney) article, to the article mentioned in this discussion, so I at least have controversies with refs. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 08:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Nick-D. Jenks24 (talk) 07:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I don't understand this AfD. As much as many refer to the paper as a chip wrapper, it is clearly notable. Lister needs a WP:TROUT. TarnishedPath^talk 11:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• As the nominator of this discussion, I have added these references to the article:

1. Mediaweek (2019-02-08). "Weekend Newspaper Readership down, Sunday Telegraph is most read". Mediaweek. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
2. "Open revolt flares up in Czechoslovakia". The Sunday Telegraph. 19 November 1939. Retrieved 2023-11-25 – via National Library of Australia.
3. Christensen, Nic (2013-07-10). "News Corp Australia increases the cover prices of Sunday tabloids". Mumbrella. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
4. Hicks, Robin (26 October 2012). "Mick Carroll replaces Neil Breen as editor of The Sunday Telegraph". Mumbrella. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
5. Aston, Joe (2020-07-28). "Campion, Joyce forgive The Daily Telegraph". The Australian Financial Review. Nine Entertainment. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
6. "The Daily Telegraph most read newspaper in NSW". news.com.au. 1 October 2019. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
7. "The Sunday Telegraph wins Newspaper of the Year award". The Daily Telegraph. News Limited. 6 November 2011. Retrieved 25 November 2023.

As the nominator, I support a withdrawal of this discussion, per the above references I added. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.