The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of shopping malls in Toronto. J04n(talk page) 12:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Stockyards Shopping Centre

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a future shopping centre and is written as an advertisement. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 02:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is under construction, and it will be notable enough for Wikipedia. Nothing is gained by deleting it. The solution to an article written like an advertisement is to re-write it (which I have done), not to delete it. Ground Zero | t 03:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article about a shopping center that does not even exist, and offers little material of lasting encyclopedic value. Its purpose seems mainly be to promote the developer and the tenants. The subject lacks notability at this point and the article fails WP:CRYSTAL, WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:NOTDIR. Perhaps at some point in the future the subject will be notable, but as of now, I don't think that the article should be kept. - Mr X 03:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of shopping malls in Toronto Although this topic has been the subject of some reliable, independent sources ([1], [2]), it does not serve as a notable subject other than that. In addition, I could not find any sources for some statements claimed in the article, which is odd. Regardless, until a later time when the topic becomes more notable in reliable sources, it should probably be redirected, as per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:NOTDIR and WP:ADVERT guidelines. TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 04:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't think that the WP:ADVERT criticism is still valid. I have edited it to address those concerns already. If you have continuing concerns about language that violates WP:ADVERT, please identify it on the article's talk page and I will address it. WP:ADVERT is good grounds for editing, not for deletion. Ground Zero | t 15:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.