The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Movement Snowboards[edit]

The Movement Snowboards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; no sources are provided other than the defunct company's Facebook page, and a search turned up a couple of old blog/forum posts. Even if there are WP:RS in print somewhere out there, the article is unsalvageably unencyclopedic as currently presented. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Obvious attempt to advertise. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: spam, spam, spam. DrStrauss talk 13:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.