The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Lone Star Report[edit]

The Lone Star Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines (WP:GNG) as there does not appear to be significant coverage regarding this (now defunct) periodical. Two of the three sources cited in the article are dead links and the third source is only a passing reference by a source of questionable reliability. I ran BEFORE searches and did not find any meaningful additional sources that could serve to improve the article. Thus, I think this article should be deleted. DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.