The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Delete - The program has been around for a really long time and has hosted a lot of very notable guests, however that notability is not inherited from them just like a notable musician may record and release an album that is not notable. The key point that a notable source report on the subject is not met, and I don't mean in the article alone. While I listen to the prodcast version of the program, I can't agree that it meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Under the title "Full Armor of God Broadcast" this article has been brought to AfD twice before. The result was 'delete' in both cases. - Dravecky (talk) 16:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No bump up in affiliations since the last deletion, nothing extraordinary about this program. Too many bluelinks trying to compensate for the want of having this article. Nate•(chatter)23:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As Walter has clearly pointed out, this article (as much as I wish it did) does not meet WP:GNG. This program is one of the longest running (if not "the" longest running program) of its kind and has acheved significant global listenership, dispite it's lack of corporate backing and publicity. That is what makes this program unique and a proverbial innovative "underdog" in radio syndication and podcasting. The show is well known in Christian Metal and the host is nothing short of the Wolfman Jack of Christian Metal Radio, but mostly in "Street Credibility", which is not a reliable source. This program's main coverage is within the Christian Biker culture, itself falling short WP:GN. I wrote this article with the hope that since The Full Armor of God Broadcast has itself been used as a reliable source that it could stand alone on this fact. However in light of Mr Görlitz's very strong points, I see now that it sould be deleted, at least until such a time that proper WP:GNG can be established. Sorry for the inconveneince folks. Blessings Armorbearer777 (talk) 17:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.