The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bug Genie[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article has no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I can only guess that the reason it has been kept in previous discussions has been the extreme systemic bias towards software, especially open-source software, on Wikipedia, because if it was about any other topic and had the same lack of independent reliable sources it would have been deleted in pretty short order. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as no !votes yet. Perhaps because it's the fifth AfD for this article. If it's deleted, I advocate salting it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 19:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not have substantive third party sources to establish notability, reads like a promotional page. Reywas92^Talk 22:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.