The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vaikom Muhammad Basheer. MBisanz talk 00:58, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tharaa specials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely non-notable novel; no hits for "Thraraa specials" on Google Books, Google News archives, or Google (except Wikipedia). CtP (tc) 21:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In response, Wikipedia doesn't necessarily need complete coverage of Basheer, just of his notable works. Although I know comparative arguments are generally discouraged at AfD, I'm going to put this out here: many great and influential authors have written stories or books which don't all meet Wikipedia's notability standards. Take Isaac Asimov, for instance; despite his legendary status as a sci-fi author, there are still stories of his which I don't think warrant articles. CtP (tc) 22:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, Basheer is a notable author, but the notability of his stories cannot be inherited from this. Although it's an essay, WP:INHERITED lays this out pretty well. A merge does seem reasonable, although I'm not sure Basheer's page is the best place for it. Having more in-depth information on this novel than any of the others could give it undue weight. CtP (tc) 12:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.