The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Telegraf (1907)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. My original reasoning was: fails WP:NNEWSPAPER - no indication of significance. Reference cited is a footnote in an article about something else entirely, not in-depth, not enough to support an article. No other sources located, either on Google, GBooks, GScholar, or the www.marxists.org site. ru.wikipedia also doesn't have an article; it's a redlink on their disambig page for telegraph.

Since the de-PROD, two more sources have been added, but neither is in-depth enough to count for GNG, and neither indicates that the paper would pass the NNEWSPAPER criteria. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NPOV, there is not enoug information or sources to clearly establish a neutral point of view - one source may be biased as to the slant or notability of the paper. The cited Fiedler book"grigorij+starzew" associates journalist Grigorij Ewlampijewitsch Starzew with the paper, but I can't find anything more on him. If anyone can transliterate that name into Russian, they might be able to find out more. Smmurphy^(Talk) 23:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.