The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW and WP:HEY. In plain English, there's a strong concensus to keep, and the article has been significantly improved since the nomination, thereby removing the nominator's basis for deletion (non-admin). brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teeswater (sheep) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article has no verifiable sources. In addition to that, its text is in a form NOT like encyclopedia terms. Hellboy2hell (talk) 08:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - A quick google shows that this is a known sheep breed; I'm sure a little effort could find quality sources. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 09:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Rare Breeds Survival Trust and An Encyclopeadia of Agriculture look like usable references - Hunting dog (talk) 09:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've now edited info and those references in -Hunting dog (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: There's a current lack of sources, but I'm sure it can be improved to include reliable sources - there's ~9,420 Google hits for 'Teeswater sheep'...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 09:41, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Subject clearly passes WP:V, and an abundance of independent coverage indicates that this article warrants improving, not deleting. WilliamH (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per First pillar, i.e. consistent with a specialized encyclopedia. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - appears to be notable, should be kept. Sources can definitely be found. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 19:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.