The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taxerhof Lake[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR, was deleted on de:WP [1], not visible on amap.at, google satellite, Tiris; not listed as protected area in the Tirol official documentation [2]. Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac 1 5 02:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails verification completely, and if the Germans can't find it either, that is pretty well damning. Mangoe (talk) 03:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Austrians, yes ;-) Also think it should be deleted, can be created again if evidence should surface at some point, but since the official sources do not know of this lake at all, that is very unlikely. Braveheart (talk) 10:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.