The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tatton Group

[edit]
Tatton Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Yet another extremely small party, this one only stood in a sole seat in a sole election and then wound up. I therefore feel that it does not measure up to our notability standards and should either be deleted or merged in with the numerous other parties which have run in only one or a small number of races and not achieved any significant impact.Tyrenon (talk) 06:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.