The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  08:59, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tao Hongliang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yes, this footballer played for a whooping six minutes in a professional league. But after that he disappeared from the scene, first being demoted to the junior team and later released. Fails WP:GNG and, except for the very short football career, fails WP:V. Geschichte (talk) 06:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 06:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 06:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 07:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are no recent news reports about his release - because it is too minor for even local media to care. Soccerway is not an authoritative source on obscure Norwegian football, NFF is sometimes better but not always. Stabæk 2 is no more a part of Stabæk than their under-20 or under-17 team is. Stabæk 2 is not a professional team, it is a mixture of reserves and junior players, and the team itself languishes near the bottom of the fourth tier. Geschichte (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • If you're making assumptions like that, you could assume the other way of there isn't any news about his release because he hasn't been released. Assumptions aren't appropriate. Stabæk II is connected to Stabæk, therefore he'd be part of an FPL-listed club which would merit a keep. So it is rather important. R96Skinner (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:V is the bottom line here, and it is verified that Tao was cut from the squad. And placed with the juniors (i.e. u20's). What has happened to him since is not within the WP:V or WP:GNG a domain, since it's not reported on. Also I think you are stretching the meaning of "being a part" of club. One does of course have to be a member of the squad that actually contests a professional league, not a club member per se. Geschichte (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Stabæk and Stabæk II are the same club - that's pretty simple, and an odd thing to question. As I said, I'm content with this heading to deletion - hence why I haven't voted keep. If either of us are "stretching", that would be you. R96Skinner (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.