The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete both. A7 applies here, so there is no prejudice against a proper article with sourcing. I note that the Japanese Wikipedia has an article on the clan these samurai served; it's possible there are sources there. But that is, I think, a discussion for another day. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tani Tadasumi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

There were many samurai in Japan, no evidence this one is notable. Also including for the same reason:

Hisatake Chikanao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete)

TravellingCari 21:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 10:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note the info I just deleted from Hisatake was once again copyvio from here, same reason the entire article had initially been deleted. TravellingCari 22:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per CSD:A7, no assertion of notability. Tagged as such. Stifle (talk) 09:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.