This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Postdlf 23:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

non notable 198.214.51.1 20:11, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I got 4,120 google hits for "tal brooke", down to 479 hits for "tal brook" "Spiritual Counterfeits Project". No vote. func(talk) 21:22, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notable enough to keep. This is in a series of articles nominated by 198.214.51.1 to be deleted that have to do with discrediting the work of Sathya Sai Baba. -CunningLinguist 22:40, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable enough theologist and published author with strong POV (since when have published theologists ever had anything less than a strong POV). Hopefully we can keep the article itself NPOV. --Unfocused 04:05, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• keep both Tal Brooke and the Spiritual Counterfeits Projects are notable Christian Counter cult publishers though they do not have a strong presence on the internet. Andries 09:24, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - ideosyncratic Sai Baba critic. I first heard about him when i was in India in '82, someone suggested to me his book Lord of the Air . M Alan Kazlev 10:55, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep-per above Falphin 12:58, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.