The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The issues raised by the nominator have been addressed and corrected, see old version and compare with the new version. As such, the article now meets the notability criteria for albums. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 02:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take Time (Gyroscope EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable. Lachlanusername (talk) 09:38, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Dan arndt (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep meets WP:GNG- have provided indepth third party coverage of this release with numerous independent verifable references. Dan arndt (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Appears notable and sufficiently covered in sources independent of the topic. Orderinchaos 16:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.