The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tacito Augusto Farias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references are either dead or do not support that this person is notable. Pishcal — ♣ 05:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per failing to meet the notability guideline for academics outlined at Wikipedia:Notability (academics). An academic must be of a certain level of prestige but also scholarly achievement to their given field to warrant inclusion on this website. TF92 (talk) 10:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - nothing suggests any academic notability.--Rpclod (talk) 12:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. His failure to appear in a listing of the top 25% of publishing economists in Brazil [1] is suggestive that he doesn't pass WP:PROF, and we have no evidence to the contrary. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.