The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 13:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Table of years in paleontology

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to duplicate content in List of years in paleontology. I don't readily see the advantage of a "table" vs a list. --Animalparty-- (talk) 00:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I based it on the equivalent that existed for the years in archaeology articles. I have no clue why it exists either, I just created it to follow the example of those articles. Abyssal (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redundant duplication: aside from some redlinks at the bottom, it's the same content only in a different order. Could redirect if people think it's a plausible search term. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Delete because it is the same as List of years in paleontology. It can also be recreated as a template. Many navigability boxes are already like this. - Sidelight 12 ^Talk 02:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.