- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Taar-e-Ankaboot[edit]
- Taar-e-Ankaboot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG, tagged for notability since 2022.
A redirect after a PROD was reverted DonaldD23 talk to me 13:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
*Weak keep well known dramathat passes notability. Creater needs to work on it. Skt34 (talk) 15:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Editor blocked for sockpuppetry. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I find refs to a 1960 Iranian film of the same name, but nothing for this. Mccapra (talk) 13:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, a controversial show based on a taboo topic as I still remember a lot of speculation was made regarding the serial back than. Referencing seems fine to me and should be kept.182.182.19.93 (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Several of the sources cited in the article make no reference to the film whatsoever, leaving only trivial mentions of the film on several websites. Redtree21 (talk) 11:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Sources do not hit the three needed points of RS, IS, and SIGCOV. UtherSRG (talk) 15:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.