The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep I respectfully disagree with You, Chzz. Yes, it may not be a very notable article, but is definitely not a spam, as I am using this software for testing myself and many coleagues of mine are using it as well. That was exactly the reason why I created an article about it. Vadimka (talk) {----}16:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; no evidence that this is well-known or widely-used software; unable to find any significant third-party, reliable sources. --MCB (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.