The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as a copyright violation. Natalie 21:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Synthphonia Suprema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable band as per WP:MUSIC. No reliable third-party sources for notability, not listed at allmusicguide.com. The text is also a cut-and-paste job of [1], but I'm listing it here on reasons of notability as I'm assuming it's self-promotion and they wouldn't mind releasing their bio under a free license. Thomjakobsen 19:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Notable. M.V.E.i. 20:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep on the basis that they have about 12000 Ghits and clearly have a following which seems to be mostly European. Article needs tidying up however but if this doesn't happen within a reasonable time and include more reliable case for notability, it should go. --Rodhullandemu 21:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as a copyvio and tagged as such. Notability is a guideline, but copyright is policy. -- Whpq 16:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.