The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Syntheway[edit]

Vanity/advertising, not notable, POV got much worse after page flagged with advertising template Craig Stuntz 19:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 20:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Stifle 17:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.