The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nothing added in a week, I don't believe that this article makes any effort to show why it is notable and should stay in wikipedia. Ged UK (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—The Vegas facility they are building is absolutely enormous, and it may be part of an important trend in IT infrastructure. Please expand the article. Thanks.—67.160.10.246 (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it has its own website, explaining its products. It has a relationship with Cisco, a huge IT company. Its very notable because of this, but the creator probably was too lazy to expand or didn't have enough time to expand. Whoever put the non-notable tag there should have searched Switch Communications before they put that there.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.