The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Band Geeks. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 11:06Z

Sweet Victory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not-notable; about a song from a music library; most info already mentioned in associated Band Geeks page Mshake3 01:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete — This page seems to be reduntant to this, doesn't it? Bushcarrot (Talk·Desk) 02:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reduntant, that's the word I was looking for. Mshake3 02:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, isn't Merge the word you were looking for? :-) Pascal.Tesson 20:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Actually, really and truly, you meant "redundant". :) A Train ^{take the} 09:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to 'Band Geeks'. ck lostsword|^queta!|_Suggestions? 21:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, FPBot (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC) A Train ^{take the} 09:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Band Geeks, which I see someone has already done. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy close Seems like article's been merged. Xiner (talk, email) 21:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.