The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Delete - may be notable, but no external independent sources to demonstrate notability per WP:BIO. Delete unless sourced by end of AfD. Walton monarchist89 16:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or significantly improve It's been around for 3~ weeks with no sourcing or improvement. I'd delete it till it becomes notable enough to get a good article. A google search didn't give me much information. Whilding8719:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I sould see some notablility after 6 years on the air at a station that appears to be notable. But I'd want a bit more info first and not inspired to do the research for this. --Kevin Murray21:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.