The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sunscreen controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a lot of discussion on the talk page that this article is a POV content fork. What should happen to this article is a complicated question. The main article (Sunscreen) does address this topic, so some might argue for redirect or even outright delete. A merge would be difficult. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 07:21, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect in article section- I agree a merge would be extremely hard and the article itself is too good and outreaching to be deleted. Therefore, I support a redirect link to this article and replacing the controversy section in Sunscreen with a brief synopsis of the separate article.--The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is a legitimate sub-article of Sunscreen. Please debate merging at article talk page. Hodja Nasreddin (talk) 23:27, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Not a content fork, as Sunscreen#Potential health risks properly summarizes the information, and not PoV; in fact I think the title erred on the side of being NPOV-by-showing-both-sides, which is a common error, and thereby reduced accuracy: Potential health risks of sunscreen, per the section heading, might be a better title. Anarchangel (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.