The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 16:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday editions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub without any referencing (and tagged since 2012) and what amounts to WP:OR. While Sunday newspapers may be somewhat notable, there's nothing here to establish notability for its own article. Suggest redirecting article to the current (and one letter different) Sunday Edition disambiguation page with a link to Newspaper -- Whats new?^(talk) 03:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. -- Whats new?^(talk) 03:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. -- Whats new?^(talk) 03:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep It's a stub which needs improvement per our policy WP:IMPERFECT. Please see WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't nominate it because it was a stub, I nominated because there is nothing that demonstrates why it is notable or anything verifiable, that couldn't be better covered in the newspaper article. -- Whats new?^(talk) 23:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • The nominator doesn't provide any reason to delete the page and actually suggests redirection – an action which is ordinary editing, rather than deletion. I am amending my !vote to Speedy Keep. Andrew D. (talk) 00:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • I gave multiple reasons - WP:V and WP:N being the serious two. Redirection is a valid suggestion per WP:ATD-R and quite common in AfDs. -- Whats new?^(talk) 00:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Andrew Davidson. This is a perfectly valid article topic. Lepricavark (talk) 16:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Care to point to RS that establish notability as a "perfectly valid" topic in its own right? -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Wrong forum  Nomination advocates for a WP:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion, whereas this forum is "Articles for deletion" discussion.  See WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.