The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sujoy K. Guha

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable figure. Promo style Biography. Educationtemple (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree with the article having problems with WP:PROMOTION but I don't think the topic fails WP:GNG, the work done by Guha has been covered by secondary sources so while the article could use improvement I think there is enough notability to build on. Bryce Carmony (talk) 19:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Does appear to be a distinguished scientist and holder of chairs at two prestigious institutions. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think the chair at IIT-KGP is enough for WP:PROF#C5. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.