The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sudeepta Aurka

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer who does not pass WP:CRIN or WP:GNG. Under-19 internationals are not sufficient. I have removed a false claim of notability from article (World Cup appearance). Spike 'em (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, fails WP:NCRIC, having not played in a FC, LA or T20 match. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above the nominator, the article about an emerging cricketer can't be acceptable with just providing a content on his junior level experience and at least he somehow needs to play in either List A cricket, T20 matches or the First-class cricket matches to get notability. Abishe (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another non-notable cricket player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.