The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suburban fluxus

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a term coined by Hillerbrand+Magsamen and seems to be used sparingly by them and no-one else. Therefore I'd say this was a non-notable neologism. Sionk (talk) 20:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Already covered in the Hillerbrand + Magsamen article to appropriate length (one sentence). No need for a separate article. AllyD (talk) 09:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.