The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 14:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SubCulture (webcomic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't seem to be a notable comic; the sources are pretty much marginal at best. Also likely COI given page author's name. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - WP:COI / WP:N. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Between the critical acclaim and the webcomic being rooted in a book, I'd judge this to be notable enough. The page needs a little editing & polishing, but it's worth keeping. 66.71.100.36 (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No assertion of notability. 'Critical aclaim' is not a criteria for notability and the 'critical aclaim' this article alleges comes from unverifiable/unreliable/self published sources of no authority so should largely be discounted. The webcomic being rooted in a book is of no consequence either. Fails WP:WEB --neonwhite user page talk 19:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The serious WP:COI issues aside, there is no assertion of notability. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 17:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Emperor (talk) 22:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.