The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, per arguments regarding lack of non-trivial third-party coverage. Unfortunately, non-English sources are difficult to employ in notability calculations. MastCell ^Talk 22:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stitch poker

[edit]

Vanity article, no evidence the game exists. Google search comes up with nothing besides this article and some pages with random usage of the two words. 2005 01:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I originally prod'ed this article for the same reason. Someone said on the discussion page that the game is really Finnish, and the non-English name for it is Tikkipokka, for which there is some support in Google. [1] Most of the Google hits aren't in English, but I gave the editor the benefit of the doubt. eaolson 02:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --RucasHost 04:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- barring some evidence, no need to delete, per Eaolson.AGFJJJ999 06:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Some evidence of what? Evidence that the game doesn't exist??? There is no evidence the game exists. Asking for evidence that the game does NOT exist is silly. 2005 08:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable game. There are even fewer Google hits for "Tikkipokka" than for "Stitch poker". Unless notability is established by non-trivial third-party coverage, delete. - Mike Rosoft 23:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.