The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 04:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stitch, Inc.

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Best RS seem to have trivial sources as per WP:NCORP, specifically "inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists". Other sources both cited in article and found elsewhere are more along the lines of PR and thus fail other parts of the WP:CORP criteria. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 03:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 03:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom, fails WP:NCORP. Otr500 (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing⁺⁺ 15:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above comments. --Kostas20142 (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - promotional, awards section is unsourced by reliable sources. per above --Quek157 (talk) 17:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper nom. and comments above. Promotional and not well sourced. There seems to be unanimous consensus. Gianvito Scaringi (talk) 19:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.