The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stanky legg

[edit]

Delete barely comprehensible WP:MADEUP dance. Mayalld (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my prod, wikipedia is not a guide or a manual on how to do something. --Terrillja _talk 16:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updated after revision: Still not a notable dance. --Terrillja _talk 16:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Brownsnout spookfish (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable dance WP:NOTGUIDE. JamesBurns (talk) 07:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThis dance is an underground phenomenon, evidenced by the number of people performing it in homemade youtube videos as well as Yung Joc signing the GS Boys to a record deal in response to their "Do Da Stanky Legg" single. This is simply not a "made-up" dance. This is also not an instructional page, but a verbal demonstration of the dance itself. To meet criteria, I have excluded the step-by-step description of the dance itself.

--Offchance (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You also attempted, in a second edit, to delete the AFD notice. Please don't do that again. Mayalld (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(I apologize for deleting the AFD notice after misinterpreting the wording. It will not happen again. --Offchance (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Keep, surprisingly. http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/dc9/2008/12/even_the_portland_trailblazers.php shows the Portland Trailblazers' rookies doing it at a pre-season scrimmage, and searching "Stanky+legg"+-video+-lyrics+-ringtones+-mp3 www.google.com/search?q="Stanky+legg"+-video+-lyrics+-ringtones+-mp3 gives a fair number of hits - not reliable ones, but the quantity is indicative.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.