The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 03:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Warfare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable webgame (MMORPG), no claims to notability, no reviews from reliable independent sources. Fails WP:WEB. Previously deleted a few times through speedy and prod, but never a full AfD duscussion, so this seemed like as good a time as any. Author may have WP:COI issues based on username, but that's not the main deletion reason. Fram 19:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No reliable third party sources. --Wafulz 20:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:WEB, nothing to WP:ATTribute this article to. The case of WP:COI seems likely from the article's aggressive author namedropping. MURGH ^disc. 11:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to remove any excessive namedropping. http://xMillar.com 15:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment, That does seem to be much better, but the problem remains with lack of sources. If provided publication mentions and/or reviews, it would help considerably to justify the article's WP presence. MURGH ^disc. 15:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:V. Article only cites primary sources. A Google search for "Standard Warfare" yields nothing reliable from the 220 unique hits; it looks like there are no good secondary sources that exist. Mitaphane _?|! 21:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - To my eyes the article fails WP:N, WP:V and WP:WEB. DarkSaber2k 11:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. DarkSaber2k 11:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.