The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Completing incomplete nomination by User:219.90.96.141 (probably User:Tanksingh).

• Keep, seems as notable as other schools. TimBentley (talk) 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it seems like a non-notable school. TJ Spyke 22:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not one of the best schools in India according to this site. Ok, so it's not the best reference, but I really did try to find something on the web that will support a keep and couldn't find anything. zephyr2k 22:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added some references. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per TruthbringerToronto's references. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 02:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a well-constructed article for a secondary school that provides thorough details of the school and its history, complete with verifiable references. Alansohn 05:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doesn't seem notable. Cedars 11:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Mergeto Roman Catholic Diocese of Indore which needs some content. Too much info about a non-notable school. A hundred non-notable facts, well referenced, are still of interest only to those attending the school.Edison 18:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — RJH (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, good article with plenty of information about a large school. bbx 22:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and allow for organic growth. Bahn Mi 00:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment That is not an argument, that is a buzzword. JoshuaZ 00:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete almost a full delete but not quite. School is generally not-notable but the size does push slightly in the direction of notability. JoshuaZ 00:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Alansohn as well as User:Silensor/Schools. No valid reason for deletion has been presented, making this a borderline speedy keep. Silensor 08:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment and as usual see the response here User:JoshuaZ/Schools. JoshuaZ 14:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, although this article reads a little poorly (do we need five subheadings in the emblem section?) it doesn't have any problems for which deletion would be a good solution. Christopher Parham (talk) 03:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.