The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) shoy (reactions) 14:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sprayway

[edit]
Sprayway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company with no reliable references. Recreated by a SPA. Kavdiamanju (talk) 11:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page should not be deleted. It has been a brand for 40 years and has some real history behind it which features on the page. The copyright alert is for information on hellotrade that is directly copied from the Sprayway website which was written by employees of the brand. There is nothing about the page that is advertising or copyright. It is simply stating facts and telling the story about the brand and the heritage behind it. (ReubenGeary (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReubenGeary (talkcontribs)[reply]

What difference is it to Berghaus, Craghoppers, Regatta and Peter Storm having a page (ReubenGeary (talk) 13:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I've speedied again and salted. I've posted ((Uw-paid1)) on the editor's user page since this is clearly an SPA interested only promoting this company. Note also above directly copied from the Sprayway website which was written by employees of the brand Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.