The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yash ! 12:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spartans Futbol Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Club has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I still believe that playing in the 4th tier of US soccer is notable, but the community disagrees, and so I have to go with that. No evidence this club meets GNG either. Giant Snowman 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This team (unlike the Canadian team that User:GiantSnowman notes above) is eligible to play in the U.S. Open Cup. And it has played in US Open Cup qualification rounds in 2014 and 2015 thus meeting WP:FOOTYN. Nfitz (talk) 18:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Nfitz and 4th tier of US soccer clubs are notable and a single AFD is not a barometer further this club is eligible to play in the U.S. Open Cup.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per eligibility. MB298 (talk) 04:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.