The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete but could still be merged/redirected as an editorial decision. W.marsh 13:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Cayuga High School

[edit]

Doesn't meet WP:N Delete Nick Garvey 05:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no assertion of notoriety. meshach 06:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Minimum satisfactory H.S. article. — RJH (talk) 15:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - could use some expansion <3 Clamster 00:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets minimum requirements (ex: there are two sources as external links), could use some more information concerning noteworthiness. If we delete this article, there are several others of less quality that would quickly follow. Truthanado 00:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete , per Truthanado. Just as AfDs sometime get articles improved fast, they can also be a good way to indentify additional articles on non-notable subjects. DGG 01:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Butseriouslyfolks 01:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N, no assertion of notability so even qualifies as speedy, and external links are not noted as sources, so deletable per WP:V. --Butseriouslyfolks 01:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Cayuga County, New York per WP:LOCAL and various proposed school guidelines. RFerreira 06:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cayuga County, NY per above. --TREYWiki 03:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Additional sources exist and should be added to further expand the article. Alansohn 03:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Delete. As it stands there is nothing to defend notability, per WP:SCHOOL. The "creator" of the article Kappa, who last maintained it May 10th by deleting a reference source due to "link rot", may be prepared to abandon it: "You might be able to kill off this one. Actually I don't enjoy making articles about random high schools but I can make if more necessary. Kappa 23:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)"[1]. If no editor is willing to go to the trouble of searching for notability references, national recognition, famous alumni, historical importance, athletic accomplishments, etc. with reliable sources, then there is nothing to defend a Keep, even for proposed improvements. Article has been essentially a stagnant stub since October 2005 [2]. No school pride? Just sad. If someone commits here to making major improvements, and already has some strong examples of notablility to post, then Keep would be appropriate. --T-dot ( ^Talk/contribs ) 15:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete - I don't see any external links that 1) actually assert any notability and 2) which are independent. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 21:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.