The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soul Kingz Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no references outside of Soul Kingz own website and iTunes. The "notable" artists on the label all have articles created by the same person who made this article, FrankKoch, and they all base their notability on one thing: a claim of having a single song chart on the German Urban Charts with the only evidence being a facebook post from one of the artists themselves (MNSSH). This appears to be a slow moving attempt to promote a label and its artists. Justeditingtoday (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete My news and web searches have found nothing. Even if the artists were notable notability is not inherited. AusLondonder (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.