The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete while WP:POV is not a reason for deletion, articles in this position should be tagged for cleanup. In this case the question of notability was raised and remains unaddressed, article is deleted without prejudice. I'd be happy to restore if notability is addressed. Gnangarra 07:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Ericsson T650 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Most of this fails WP:POV. I doubt there is anything notable about this phone that would warrant its own article. A^RendedWinter 13:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think POV in itself is a reason for deletion. It is a reason for cleanup. The notability concerns seem more relevant. Are there any precedents for specific mobile phone AfDs? Martijn Hoekstra 13:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator -- this product is not individually notable. /Blaxthos 15:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Suitable topic, not POV. I'd like to see coverage of all handsets. Maybe not one per article. However, content needs to be supported by third party sources. Please add sources and improve. --SmokeyJoe 12:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No POV problems. Not less notable than others - and how many "notable" mobile phones are there, apart from Motorola DynaTAC? GregorB 20:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.