The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, uncontested. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Poulton

[edit]
Sonia Poulton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous AFD was "no consensus" - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Poulton. Since then there have been no positive reasons made for keeping this article - see talk page discussion - Talk:Sonia Poulton. Her credibility as a notable journalist is dubious. Anybody can call themselves a journalist. Many others with at least as much credibility don't have Wikipedia entries.--Penbat (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. sst 12:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.