The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Xavexgoem (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sogi (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This DAB page should never have been created as there is nothing to disambiguate. Per WP:Dab "Disambiguation is required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might search, there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead." gråb whåt you cån (talk) 11:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete nothing to disambiguate so therefore this page is useless--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 11:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. While the initial creation was weak, I've added a number of ambiguous uses that are addressed within Wikipedia. older ≠ wiser 14:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Nicely done. On the basis of BKonrad's edit I now support keeping. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep Well saved by Bkonrad and the nominator appears to have withdrawn the nom. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 07:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.