The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Nominator blocked as sock, discussion is ongoing at RfD. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Social unit[edit]

Social unit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 5#Social unit it was decided that this venue is better suited for this kind of discussion. I propose delete because I wasn't able to find any reliable sources analyzing the usage of the term. BlackBony (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. BlackBony (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• While the nominator has been blocked for socking, I think the concern raised by the nom still needs to be resolved. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Or someone could just revert the sock's closure of the RfD and let someone else close that discussion? – Uanfala (talk) 15:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that would be even better. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 17:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.