The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:31, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Social Issues in Cambodia

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Not a well-written or verified article that resembles an essay. The topic might be notable, but not in this way: too argumentative. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 03:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Given that the article creator endorsed the original PROD, and the other major contributor recently blanked the page, could this not be deleted under G7? Yunshui (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.