The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sniff Petrol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no assertion of the blog's notability; wholly unsourced Karpouzi (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this online magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no assertion it meets any criterion under WP:WEB. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB. Warrah (talk) 16:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.