The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. causa sui (talk) 00:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Smuggling Duds

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. When performing a Google search for "Smuggling Duds" the only hits related to the company appear to be advertisement and self-promotion. I see little to no independent coverage of the company or its products. TreyGeek (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable company. The company has a European and US design registered product and helps solve a big problem that is of interest to the public. Bennit3b (talk) 20:09, 21 July 2011

I believe that Bennit3b (talk · contribs) has a conflict of interest in this discussion. Comments made by them suggest they are associated with this company. --TreyGeek (talk) 19:49, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Bennit3b's assertions, while possibly true, do not create notability. Simply having a registered patent, or registering a company, does not mean a company meets WP:CORP. There are simply no reliable sources (either with the article or elsewhere online) that support's this company's notability. Singularity42 (talk) 00:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CORP and WP:INDY. No independent reliable sources; I couldn't find any new sources in a Google search. Richwales (talk · contribs) 06:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.