The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Virtually zero independent sources provided to demonstrate notability. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Small Cell Forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not entirely sure if notable, and not well referenced. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now as there's nothing better than these links. Feel free to draft and userfy, SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As this article is re-listed "to generate a more thorough discussion..." I thought I'd give my view about the 'notability' aspect. Given that I'm the one who originally created this article, maybe my view may not count as fair and unbiased discussion, but I'd give it anyway for what its worth.

1. The information given in section 1, 3, and 5 can be considered as the type of information found in encyclopedia.
2. Section 1 clarifies the relationship between two similar industry Fora and explains that one is a former name of the other rather than two separate and independent groups. Such information is certainly not "obvious" and a "common knowledge" by casual lay persons unless he/she is involved with telecom industry and knowledgeable in such industry consortium and their activities.
3. Due to the reasons above, I contend that the previous comment of "...there's nothing better than these links" (Google search result) is simply an opinion of one person and not a fact.Wellcreek (talk) 16:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.