The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. As pointed out by many editors below, the fact that a concept does not have mainstream support does not, in itself, demonstrate a lack of notability. Articles with NPOV problems should be fixed, not deleted. --Selket Talk 14:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sixth pillar of Islam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is not a main-stream concept. There is no reason to create article using couple of references for something that does not exist. It is against WP:NPOV and WP:Undue weight. A. L. M. 16:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some Kharijite groups also support the existence of a sixth pillar. You should bring this up on the Talk page of that article before AfD'ing it. What partly makes it notable is that this is one of the differences between Sunni Islam and other types of Islam.--Matt57 (talkcontribs) 17:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Do you have any have source which says that Shia consider it as Sixth pillar of Islam ? Or just because you think it is? --- A. L. M. 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It does not represent Shia main steam concept. If article name could be changed Sixth Pillar of Islam (Kharijites) then we could keep it otherwise it is wrong to present it as general Muslim concept and misguide people. --- A. L. M. 17:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still Keep.Alright I support the rename as its related to the Kharjites only. You're right, my assumption about the Shias was incorrect, sorry. --Matt57 (talkcontribs) 17:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The keywords are "You have only read about it here!"IP198 01:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scroll to the bottom and it says

IP198 15:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.