The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to National Museum of Singapore. Courcelles 23:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore History Gallery

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be redirected to main article of the National Museum of Singapore, doesn't require an individual article. Quiggers1P (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge as you say this is just part of a bigger article and as such should be summarised and put as a sub section only in the national museum of singapore article.Seasider91 (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge per nom. Why are we at AfD? StarM 01:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
merge as per Seasider91. Ugh, why is this at AfD? Whiteguru (talk) 12:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Why create an individual article when being so small, it can just be mentioned on the Museum's page. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge It can always be re-created if it ever becomes worthy of an article in its own right. A week on - all opinions the same - someone needs to be WP:BOLD Arjayay (talk) 17:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.